[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] The BYSETPOS and BYWEEKNO RRULES


Hi David,

CalDavZAP started (as an internal project) before the "rrule" project.

We will check that library (functionality and performance tests) and if it
works as expected (and it's fast enough), we will replace our internal rrule
processing in future.

And "BYSETPOS and BYWEEKNO RRULES" are currently not supported
because design is very important for us, and support for these parameters
looks really terrible in the interface (and read-only support is a bad idea - we
don't like "half solutions"). This doesn't mean that we will not support them,
it's only about priorities (e.g. invitation is much more important for us).


JM


> On 05 Feb 2015, at 22:40, David Raison <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 05/02/15 22:18, David Raison wrote:
>> Now, I'd like to ask whether anyone has started working on implementing
>> support for these or if it is considered impossible/unhealthy?
> 
> Just wanted to quickly follow-up to this one myself. I found rrule.js
> which seems to parse the rule in question just fine:
> http://jakubroztocil.github.io/rrule/
> 
> It's been around since 2012 so I guess you might already have seen it
> and decided not to use this for some reason. If that is the case, I'd
> love to read about it before trying to integrate it.
> 
> Best regards,
> David
> 
> -- 
> TenTwentyFour S.à r.l.
> W: www.tentwentyfour.lu
> T: +352 20 211 1024
> F: +352 20 211 1023
> 9, avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux
> L-4362 Esch/Alzette
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Follow-Ups:
Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] The BYSETPOS and BYWEEKNO RRULESDavid Raison <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
[Inf-IT DAVcl] The BYSETPOS and BYWEEKNO RRULESDavid Raison <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] The BYSETPOS and BYWEEKNO RRULESDavid Raison <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>