[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] Blank page,with Internet Explorer

If I might interject, digest is widely accepted as laughably weak and thus a generally unnecessary layer when the entire session (including the authentication process) is already secured via SSL or TLS.

"If we can encrypt it once, why not encrypt it twice?!"
                           - The crazy sys admin

I would compare Digest Authentication to requiring a second password for login, but that password can be no longer than 3 characters and is brute-forced independently; you're much better off to increase the length of the original password (key length for our purposes) or explore other avenues of security that don't unnecessarily increase complexity/server load (one-time passwords maybe? The world is your oyster).

If you're genuinely interested in the topic, I'd be happy to elaborate on anything unclear.

Colin Purcell | IT Administrator

On 2016-04-04 5:39 am, Tobias Mueller wrote:

On Mo, 2016-04-04 at 11:21 +0300, Ján Máté wrote:
If you read the documentation, there is a mention about incorrect
implementation of Digest auth in lot of browsers (especially if used
from JavaScript in combination with preflight requests, etc.).
hm. that's odd.
The only thing I could find is
which currently reads:

    4.) Digest authentication problems and how to solve them (if your
server uses digest auth)
        - Why digest authentication is problematic?
          Lot of browsers have wrong or buggy digest auth support
(especially if used from JavaScript).
        - What to do to solve this problem?
          a.) Disable the digest authentication and enable the basic
authentication in your server config (NOTE: ALWAYS use SSL /https/ for
basic authentication!)
          b.) Alternatively (if it is not possible to switch to basic
auth) you can try to enable the globalUseJqueryAuth option in
config.js (NOTE: there is no guarantee that it will work in your
          NOTE: if you want to use the auth module /see 6.) c.) below/
you MUST use basic auth (there is no digest auth support in this

Unfortunately, it doesn't point to any actually identified problem.
So for now, the claims are not substantiated and it looks as if
theterrible security advice is given without reason.

So really don't use digest, use basic auth in combination WITH
Sure. But that's two separate issues, as TLS is not used for (client)
authentication. You probably want both, a reasonably secure encryption
as well as a reasonably secure authentication.  Recommending to use the
less secure authentication without (very) good cause seems ill-advised
to me.


[Inf-IT DAVcl] Fwd: Blank page,with Internet ExplorerAdmin - Muskoka Auto Parts Limited <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] Blank page,with Internet ExplorerJán Máté <jan.mate@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] Blank page,with Internet ExplorerTobias Mueller <muelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] Blank page,with Internet ExplorerJán Máté <jan.mate@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [Inf-IT DAVcl] Blank page,with Internet ExplorerTobias Mueller <muelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>